Artificial Intelligence Nanodegree

Convolutional Neural Networks

Project: Write an Algorithm for a Dog Identification App


In this notebook, some template code has already been provided for you, and you will need to implement additional functionality to successfully complete this project. You will not need to modify the included code beyond what is requested. Sections that begin with '(IMPLEMENTATION)' in the header indicate that the following block of code will require additional functionality which you must provide. Instructions will be provided for each section, and the specifics of the implementation are marked in the code block with a 'TODO' statement. Please be sure to read the instructions carefully!

Note: Once you have completed all of the code implementations, you need to finalize your work by exporting the iPython Notebook as an HTML document. Before exporting the notebook to html, all of the code cells need to have been run so that reviewers can see the final implementation and output. You can then export the notebook by using the menu above and navigating to \n", "File -> Download as -> HTML (.html). Include the finished document along with this notebook as your submission.

In addition to implementing code, there will be questions that you must answer which relate to the project and your implementation. Each section where you will answer a question is preceded by a 'Question X' header. Carefully read each question and provide thorough answers in the following text boxes that begin with 'Answer:'. Your project submission will be evaluated based on your answers to each of the questions and the implementation you provide.

Note: Code and Markdown cells can be executed using the Shift + Enter keyboard shortcut. Markdown cells can be edited by double-clicking the cell to enter edit mode.

The rubric contains optional "Stand Out Suggestions" for enhancing the project beyond the minimum requirements. If you decide to pursue the "Stand Out Suggestions", you should include the code in this IPython notebook.


Why We're Here

In this notebook, you will make the first steps towards developing an algorithm that could be used as part of a mobile or web app. At the end of this project, your code will accept any user-supplied image as input. If a dog is detected in the image, it will provide an estimate of the dog's breed. If a human is detected, it will provide an estimate of the dog breed that is most resembling. The image below displays potential sample output of your finished project (... but we expect that each student's algorithm will behave differently!).

Sample Dog Output

In this real-world setting, you will need to piece together a series of models to perform different tasks; for instance, the algorithm that detects humans in an image will be different from the CNN that infers dog breed. There are many points of possible failure, and no perfect algorithm exists. Your imperfect solution will nonetheless create a fun user experience!

The Road Ahead

We break the notebook into separate steps. Feel free to use the links below to navigate the notebook.

  • Step 0: Import Datasets
  • Step 1: Detect Humans
  • Step 2: Detect Dogs
  • Step 3: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (from Scratch)
  • Step 4: Use a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)
  • Step 5: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)
  • Step 6: Write your Algorithm
  • Step 7: Test Your Algorithm

Step 0: Import Datasets

Import Dog Dataset

In the code cell below, we import a dataset of dog images. We populate a few variables through the use of the load_files function from the scikit-learn library:

  • train_files, valid_files, test_files - numpy arrays containing file paths to images
  • train_targets, valid_targets, test_targets - numpy arrays containing onehot-encoded classification labels
  • dog_names - list of string-valued dog breed names for translating labels
In [1]:
from sklearn.datasets import load_files       
from keras.utils import np_utils
import numpy as np
from glob import glob

# define function to load train, test, and validation datasets
def load_dataset(path):
    data = load_files(path)
    dog_files = np.array(data['filenames'])
    dog_targets = np_utils.to_categorical(np.array(data['target']), 133)
    return dog_files, dog_targets

# load train, test, and validation datasets
train_files, train_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/train')
valid_files, valid_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/valid')
test_files, test_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/test')

# load list of dog names
dog_names = [item[20:-1] for item in sorted(glob("dogImages/train/*/"))]

# print statistics about the dataset
print('There are %d total dog categories.' % len(dog_names))
print('There are %s total dog images.\n' % len(np.hstack([train_files, valid_files, test_files])))
print('There are %d training dog images.' % len(train_files))
print('There are %d validation dog images.' % len(valid_files))
print('There are %d test dog images.'% len(test_files))
Using TensorFlow backend.
There are 133 total dog categories.
There are 8351 total dog images.

There are 6680 training dog images.
There are 835 validation dog images.
There are 836 test dog images.

Import Human Dataset

In the code cell below, we import a dataset of human images, where the file paths are stored in the numpy array human_files.

In [2]:
import random
random.seed(8675309)

# load filenames in shuffled human dataset
human_files = np.array(glob("lfw/*/*"))
random.shuffle(human_files)

# print statistics about the dataset
print('There are %d total human images.' % len(human_files))
There are 13233 total human images.

Step 1: Detect Humans

We use OpenCV's implementation of Haar feature-based cascade classifiers to detect human faces in images. OpenCV provides many pre-trained face detectors, stored as XML files on github. We have downloaded one of these detectors and stored it in the haarcascades directory.

In the next code cell, we demonstrate how to use this detector to find human faces in a sample image.

In [3]:
import cv2                
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt                        
%matplotlib inline                               

# extract pre-trained face detector
face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('haarcascades/haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml')

# load color (BGR) image
img = cv2.imread(human_files[3])
# convert BGR image to grayscale
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)

# find faces in image
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)

# print number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected:', len(faces))

# get bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    # add bounding box to color image
    cv2.rectangle(img,(x,y),(x+w,y+h),(255,0,0),2)
    
# convert BGR image to RGB for plotting
cv_rgb = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)

# display the image, along with bounding box
plt.imshow(cv_rgb)
plt.show()
Number of faces detected: 1

Before using any of the face detectors, it is standard procedure to convert the images to grayscale. The detectMultiScale function executes the classifier stored in face_cascade and takes the grayscale image as a parameter.

In the above code, faces is a numpy array of detected faces, where each row corresponds to a detected face. Each detected face is a 1D array with four entries that specifies the bounding box of the detected face. The first two entries in the array (extracted in the above code as x and y) specify the horizontal and vertical positions of the top left corner of the bounding box. The last two entries in the array (extracted here as w and h) specify the width and height of the box.

Write a Human Face Detector

We can use this procedure to write a function that returns True if a human face is detected in an image and False otherwise. This function, aptly named face_detector, takes a string-valued file path to an image as input and appears in the code block below.

In [4]:
# returns "True" if face is detected in image stored at img_path
def face_detector(img_path):
    img = cv2.imread(img_path)
    gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
    faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)
    return len(faces) > 0

(IMPLEMENTATION) Assess the Human Face Detector

Question 1: Use the code cell below to test the performance of the face_detector function.

  • What percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face?
  • What percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face?

Ideally, we would like 100% of human images with a detected face and 0% of dog images with a detected face. You will see that our algorithm falls short of this goal, but still gives acceptable performance. We extract the file paths for the first 100 images from each of the datasets and store them in the numpy arrays human_files_short and dog_files_short.

Answer:

In [5]:
human_files_short = human_files[:100]
dog_files_short = train_files[:100]
# Do NOT modify the code above this line.

## TODO: Test the performance of the face_detector algorithm 
## on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.

count = 0 
for human in human_files_short:
    count+= 1 if face_detector(human) else 0
print("Number of Human Face detected = "+str(count) + " and % of Humans correctly classified having human faces is = "+ str(100*count/len(human_files_short))+'%')

## on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.
count = 0 
for dog in dog_files_short:
    count+= 1 if face_detector(dog) else 0
print("Number of Human Face detected = "+str(count) + " and % of mis-classified Dogs having Human faces is = "+ str(100*count/len(dog_files_short))+'%')
Number of Human Face detected = 99 and % of Humans correctly classified having human faces is = 99.0%
Number of Human Face detected = 12 and % of mis-classified Dogs having Human faces is = 12.0%

Example of misclassification in dog images having a human face.

In [6]:
img = cv2.imread( train_files[0] )
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)
for (x,y,w,h) in faces : 
    cv2.rectangle(img,(x,y),(x+w,y+h),(255,0,0),2)
img_color = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
plt.imshow(img_color)
plt.show()

Question 2: This algorithmic choice necessitates that we communicate to the user that we accept human images only when they provide a clear view of a face (otherwise, we risk having unneccessarily frustrated users!). In your opinion, is this a reasonable expectation to pose on the user? If not, can you think of a way to detect humans in images that does not necessitate an image with a clearly presented face?

Answer:

We suggest the face detector from OpenCV as a potential way to detect human images in your algorithm, but you are free to explore other approaches, especially approaches that make use of deep learning :). Please use the code cell below to design and test your own face detection algorithm. If you decide to pursue this optional task, report performance on each of the datasets.

Using alternatives OpenCV face Detectors

haarcascades frontalface detectors, source link: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/tree/master/data/haarcascades

In [12]:
## Using alternative face detector available in OpenCV
#### haarcascades frontalface detectors source link: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/tree/master/data/haarcascades
    
classifiers=['haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml', 'haarcascade_frontalface_alt2.xml', 'haarcascade_frontalface_alt_tree.xml', 'haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml', 'haarcascade_profileface.xml']
for classifier in classifiers: 
    face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('haarcascades/'+classifier)
    # returns "True" if face is detected in image stored at img_path
    def face_detector(img_path):
        img = cv2.imread(img_path)
        gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
        faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)
        return len(faces) > 0

    humans = len([ hum for hum in human_files_short if face_detector(hum)])
    dogs = len([dog for dog in dog_files_short if face_detector(dog)]) 
    print("\nUsing Classifier {} \nCorrectly classified humans = {}%\nMis-classified Dogs = {}%".format(classifier,humans,dogs))
Using Classifier haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml 
Correctly classified humans = 99%
Mis-classified Dogs = 12%

Using Classifier haarcascade_frontalface_alt2.xml 
Correctly classified humans = 100%
Mis-classified Dogs = 19%

Using Classifier haarcascade_frontalface_alt_tree.xml 
Correctly classified humans = 57%
Mis-classified Dogs = 1%

Using Classifier haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml 
Correctly classified humans = 100%
Mis-classified Dogs = 54%

Using Classifier haarcascade_profileface.xml 
Correctly classified humans = 40%
Mis-classified Dogs = 3%

Using an alternative face detector with Keras

In [21]:
import keras
from keras.preprocessing import image

# Load data in tensor fomat -  train_files and human_files
def create_image_tensor(path): 
    img = cv2.imread(path)
    return cv2.resize(img,(224,224))
    
humans_train_x =  [ create_image_tensor(h) for h in human_files[:500] ]
dogs_train_x =  [create_image_tensor(d) for d in train_files[:500]]
humans_test_x =  [ create_image_tensor(h) for h in human_files[500:1000] ]
dogs_test_x =  [create_image_tensor(d) for d in train_files[501:1000]]


# Combine the data 
humans_train_y =np.array( [[1,0]] * len(humans_train_x), dtype=np.float64)
dogs_train_y = np.array( [[0,1]] * len(dogs_train_x), dtype=np.float64)
train_all_x = np.concatenate((humans_train_x,dogs_train_x) ,axis=0)
train_all_y = np.concatenate((humans_train_y,dogs_train_y), axis=0)

humans_test_y =np.array( [[1,0]] * len(humans_test_x), dtype=np.float64)
dogs_test_y = np.array( [[0,1]] * len(dogs_test_x), dtype=np.float64)
test_all_x = np.concatenate((humans_test_x,dogs_test_x) ,axis=0)
test_all_y = np.concatenate((humans_test_y,dogs_test_y), axis=0)


print('There are %d total combined train images.' % len(train_all_x))

# define a model 
from keras.layers import Dense, Conv2D, Dropout, MaxPool2D,GlobalAveragePooling2D,Activation, Flatten
from keras.activations import relu, linear,sigmoid
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint, EarlyStopping


model =  Sequential()

# layer 1 Convolution
model.add(Conv2D(filters=16, kernel_size=2, strides=2, padding='valid' ,input_shape=(224,224,3) ))
model.add(Activation('relu'))
model.add(MaxPool2D(pool_size=2))

# layer 2 Convolution 
model.add(Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=2, strides=2, padding='valid' ))
model.add(Activation('relu'))
model.add(MaxPool2D(pool_size=2))

# layer 3 Convolution 
model.add(Conv2D(filters=64, kernel_size=2, strides=2, padding='valid'))
model.add(Activation('relu'))
model.add(MaxPool2D(pool_size=2))

#
model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D())

#
model.add(Dropout(0.2))

#model.add(Flatten())
model.add(Dense(128, activation='relu'))
#model.add(Dropout(0.3))
model.add(Dense(2, activation='softmax'))

model.summary()
There are 1000 total combined train images.
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
conv2d_7 (Conv2D)            (None, 112, 112, 16)      208       
_________________________________________________________________
activation_7 (Activation)    (None, 112, 112, 16)      0         
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_7 (MaxPooling2 (None, 56, 56, 16)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_8 (Conv2D)            (None, 28, 28, 32)        2080      
_________________________________________________________________
activation_8 (Activation)    (None, 28, 28, 32)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_8 (MaxPooling2 (None, 14, 14, 32)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_9 (Conv2D)            (None, 7, 7, 64)          8256      
_________________________________________________________________
activation_9 (Activation)    (None, 7, 7, 64)          0         
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_9 (MaxPooling2 (None, 3, 3, 64)          0         
_________________________________________________________________
global_average_pooling2d_3 ( (None, 64)                0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_3 (Dropout)          (None, 64)                0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_5 (Dense)              (None, 128)               8320      
_________________________________________________________________
dense_6 (Dense)              (None, 2)                 258       
=================================================================
Total params: 19,122
Trainable params: 19,122
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________
In [22]:
from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint, EarlyStopping

model.compile(metrics=['accuracy'], optimizer='rmsprop', loss='categorical_crossentropy') 

epochs = 100

checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/best_human_face_detector.best.hdf5' , 
                               save_best_only=True, 
                               verbose=1, 
                               monitor='val_loss')

hist = model.fit(train_all_x, train_all_y, 
                 callbacks=[EarlyStopping(monitor='val_loss', patience=8), checkpointer], 
                 epochs=epochs, 
                 verbose=1, 
                 validation_split=0.2, 
                 batch_size=32)
Train on 800 samples, validate on 200 samples
Epoch 1/100
800/800 [==============================] - 5s 6ms/step - loss: 6.3183 - acc: 0.5837 - val_loss: 16.1181 - val_acc: 0.0000e+00

Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from inf to 16.11810, saving model to saved_models/best_human_face_detector.best.hdf5
Epoch 2/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 4.1435 - acc: 0.5887 - val_loss: 0.7008 - val_acc: 0.6200

Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 16.11810 to 0.70078, saving model to saved_models/best_human_face_detector.best.hdf5
Epoch 3/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.8734 - acc: 0.6362 - val_loss: 1.2323 - val_acc: 0.2800

Epoch 00003: val_loss did not improve from 0.70078
Epoch 4/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.5833 - acc: 0.7037 - val_loss: 1.3770 - val_acc: 0.2550

Epoch 00004: val_loss did not improve from 0.70078
Epoch 5/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.5229 - acc: 0.7800 - val_loss: 0.3483 - val_acc: 0.8350

Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 0.70078 to 0.34831, saving model to saved_models/best_human_face_detector.best.hdf5
Epoch 6/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.4707 - acc: 0.7937 - val_loss: 0.2371 - val_acc: 0.8950

Epoch 00006: val_loss improved from 0.34831 to 0.23710, saving model to saved_models/best_human_face_detector.best.hdf5
Epoch 7/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.4038 - acc: 0.8300 - val_loss: 0.4296 - val_acc: 0.7800

Epoch 00007: val_loss did not improve from 0.23710
Epoch 8/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.3148 - acc: 0.8813 - val_loss: 0.4394 - val_acc: 0.8000

Epoch 00008: val_loss did not improve from 0.23710
Epoch 9/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.3811 - acc: 0.8625 - val_loss: 0.3364 - val_acc: 0.8250

Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve from 0.23710
Epoch 10/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.2792 - acc: 0.9100 - val_loss: 1.8945 - val_acc: 0.3200

Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve from 0.23710
Epoch 11/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.2728 - acc: 0.8962 - val_loss: 0.3211 - val_acc: 0.8550

Epoch 00011: val_loss did not improve from 0.23710
Epoch 12/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.2189 - acc: 0.9113 - val_loss: 0.3563 - val_acc: 0.8450

Epoch 00012: val_loss did not improve from 0.23710
Epoch 13/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.2773 - acc: 0.9000 - val_loss: 0.4683 - val_acc: 0.7550

Epoch 00013: val_loss did not improve from 0.23710
Epoch 14/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.2116 - acc: 0.9312 - val_loss: 0.1451 - val_acc: 0.9400

Epoch 00014: val_loss improved from 0.23710 to 0.14511, saving model to saved_models/best_human_face_detector.best.hdf5
Epoch 15/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.2345 - acc: 0.9088 - val_loss: 0.3102 - val_acc: 0.8850

Epoch 00015: val_loss did not improve from 0.14511
Epoch 16/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.1435 - acc: 0.9425 - val_loss: 0.0062 - val_acc: 1.0000

Epoch 00016: val_loss improved from 0.14511 to 0.00620, saving model to saved_models/best_human_face_detector.best.hdf5
Epoch 17/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.2544 - acc: 0.9150 - val_loss: 0.1491 - val_acc: 0.9400

Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve from 0.00620
Epoch 18/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.1708 - acc: 0.9438 - val_loss: 0.1540 - val_acc: 0.9400

Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve from 0.00620
Epoch 19/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.1672 - acc: 0.9375 - val_loss: 0.2312 - val_acc: 0.9100

Epoch 00019: val_loss did not improve from 0.00620
Epoch 20/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.1328 - acc: 0.9550 - val_loss: 0.2120 - val_acc: 0.9100

Epoch 00020: val_loss did not improve from 0.00620
Epoch 21/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.1810 - acc: 0.9425 - val_loss: 0.2767 - val_acc: 0.8800

Epoch 00021: val_loss did not improve from 0.00620
Epoch 22/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.1703 - acc: 0.9487 - val_loss: 0.3068 - val_acc: 0.8600

Epoch 00022: val_loss did not improve from 0.00620
Epoch 23/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.1097 - acc: 0.9600 - val_loss: 0.0959 - val_acc: 0.9550

Epoch 00023: val_loss did not improve from 0.00620
Epoch 24/100
800/800 [==============================] - 3s 4ms/step - loss: 0.1518 - acc: 0.9537 - val_loss: 0.3179 - val_acc: 0.8750

Epoch 00024: val_loss did not improve from 0.00620
In [23]:
model.load_weights('saved_models/best_human_face_detector.best.hdf5')
In [26]:
# evaluate and print test accuracy
score = model.evaluate(test_all_x, test_all_y, verbose=0)
print('\n', 'Test accuracy:', 100 * score[1], "%")
 Test accuracy: 79.07907907907908 %

Answering Questing 2:

I think that we should not communicate with the users to provide a clear view of face for the algorithm to accept it, because the variety of face detectors have a main feature that a model is its discriminative feature to accurately differentiate faces from the backgrounds. The original Open CV implementation uses the Haar features which fastly detects frontal faces. However due to simple nature of Haar feature,it is relatively weak in uncontrolled enviroments, such as large visual variations, different poses, expressions and light variations. In general, it is hard to get clear view of a face, the faces might be not centered, off-focus, side views etc. so it will be reasonable for the developer to take all these complecities into consideration while designing the algorithm for face detection and fine tune the model.

We can see that for the same inputs the different haarcascade face detectors performance vary a lot. Also, we can see that our custom CNN model also has a decent accuracy score, though it is trained on a subset of the actual data.

I believe that we would be able to train a model that could recognise the human face with reasonable accuracy. For instance the custom CNN above, with a subset of the dataset had a almost 80% accuracy. With more experimentation we can achieve even more and avoid overfitting.

Overall, OpenCV's Haar Cascade algorithms/classifiers are extremely fast and it gives a quick and good way for face detection. Thus, I believe that using opencv's Haar cascade of classifier is a good option for this scenario.


Step 2: Detect Dogs

In this section, we use a pre-trained ResNet-50 model to detect dogs in images. Our first line of code downloads the ResNet-50 model, along with weights that have been trained on ImageNet, a very large, very popular dataset used for image classification and other vision tasks. ImageNet contains over 10 million URLs, each linking to an image containing an object from one of 1000 categories. Given an image, this pre-trained ResNet-50 model returns a prediction (derived from the available categories in ImageNet) for the object that is contained in the image.

In [28]:
from keras.applications.resnet50 import ResNet50

# define ResNet50 model
ResNet50_model = ResNet50(weights='imagenet')

Pre-process the Data

When using TensorFlow as backend, Keras CNNs require a 4D array (which we'll also refer to as a 4D tensor) as input, with shape

$$ (\text{nb_samples}, \text{rows}, \text{columns}, \text{channels}), $$

where nb_samples corresponds to the total number of images (or samples), and rows, columns, and channels correspond to the number of rows, columns, and channels for each image, respectively.

The path_to_tensor function below takes a string-valued file path to a color image as input and returns a 4D tensor suitable for supplying to a Keras CNN. The function first loads the image and resizes it to a square image that is $224 \times 224$ pixels. Next, the image is converted to an array, which is then resized to a 4D tensor. In this case, since we are working with color images, each image has three channels. Likewise, since we are processing a single image (or sample), the returned tensor will always have shape

$$ (1, 224, 224, 3). $$

The paths_to_tensor function takes a numpy array of string-valued image paths as input and returns a 4D tensor with shape

$$ (\text{nb_samples}, 224, 224, 3). $$

Here, nb_samples is the number of samples, or number of images, in the supplied array of image paths. It is best to think of nb_samples as the number of 3D tensors (where each 3D tensor corresponds to a different image) in your dataset!

In [28]:
from keras.preprocessing import image                  
from tqdm import tqdm

def path_to_tensor(img_path):
    # loads RGB image as PIL.Image.Image type
    img = image.load_img(img_path, target_size=(224, 224))
    # convert PIL.Image.Image type to 3D tensor with shape (224, 224, 3)
    x = image.img_to_array(img)
    # convert 3D tensor to 4D tensor with shape (1, 224, 224, 3) and return 4D tensor
    return np.expand_dims(x, axis=0)

def paths_to_tensor(img_paths):
    list_of_tensors = [path_to_tensor(img_path) for img_path in tqdm(img_paths)]
    return np.vstack(list_of_tensors)

Making Predictions with ResNet-50

Getting the 4D tensor ready for ResNet-50, and for any other pre-trained model in Keras, requires some additional processing. First, the RGB image is converted to BGR by reordering the channels. All pre-trained models have the additional normalization step that the mean pixel (expressed in RGB as $[103.939, 116.779, 123.68]$ and calculated from all pixels in all images in ImageNet) must be subtracted from every pixel in each image. This is implemented in the imported function preprocess_input. If you're curious, you can check the code for preprocess_input here.

Now that we have a way to format our image for supplying to ResNet-50, we are now ready to use the model to extract the predictions. This is accomplished with the predict method, which returns an array whose $i$-th entry is the model's predicted probability that the image belongs to the $i$-th ImageNet category. This is implemented in the ResNet50_predict_labels function below.

By taking the argmax of the predicted probability vector, we obtain an integer corresponding to the model's predicted object class, which we can identify with an object category through the use of this dictionary.

In [24]:
from keras.applications.resnet50 import preprocess_input, decode_predictions

def ResNet50_predict_labels(img_path):
    # returns prediction vector for image located at img_path
    img = preprocess_input(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    return np.argmax(ResNet50_model.predict(img))

Write a Dog Detector

While looking at the dictionary, you will notice that the categories corresponding to dogs appear in an uninterrupted sequence and correspond to dictionary keys 151-268, inclusive, to include all categories from 'Chihuahua' to 'Mexican hairless'. Thus, in order to check to see if an image is predicted to contain a dog by the pre-trained ResNet-50 model, we need only check if the ResNet50_predict_labels function above returns a value between 151 and 268 (inclusive).

We use these ideas to complete the dog_detector function below, which returns True if a dog is detected in an image (and False if not).

In [16]:
### returns "True" if a dog is detected in the image stored at img_path
def dog_detector(img_path):
    prediction = ResNet50_predict_labels(img_path)
    return ((prediction <= 268) & (prediction >= 151)) 

(IMPLEMENTATION) Assess the Dog Detector

Question 3: Use the code cell below to test the performance of your dog_detector function.

  • What percentage of the images in human_files_short have a detected dog?
  • What percentage of the images in dog_files_short have a detected dog?

Answer:

In [17]:
### TODO: Test the performance of the dog_detector function
### on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.
human_files_short = human_files[:100]
dog_files_short = train_files[:100]
# Do NOT modify the code above this line.

## TODO: Test the performance of the face_detector algorithm 
count = 0 
for human in human_files_short:
    count+= 1 if dog_detector(human) else 0
print("Number of Dogs detected = "+str(count) + " and % of Humans mis-classified is = "+ str(count)+'%')

## on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.
count = 0 
for dog in dog_files_short:
    count+= 1 if dog_detector(dog) else 0
print("Number of Dogs detected = "+str(count) + " and % of Dogs correctly classified is = "+ str(count)+'%')
Number of Dogs detected = 1 and % of Humans mis-classified is = 1%
Number of Dogs detected = 100 and % of Dogs correctly classified is = 100%

Step 3: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (from Scratch)

Now that we have functions for detecting humans and dogs in images, we need a way to predict breed from images. In this step, you will create a CNN that classifies dog breeds. You must create your CNN from scratch (so, you can't use transfer learning yet!), and you must attain a test accuracy of at least 1%. In Step 5 of this notebook, you will have the opportunity to use transfer learning to create a CNN that attains greatly improved accuracy.

Be careful with adding too many trainable layers! More parameters means longer training, which means you are more likely to need a GPU to accelerate the training process. Thankfully, Keras provides a handy estimate of the time that each epoch is likely to take; you can extrapolate this estimate to figure out how long it will take for your algorithm to train.

We mention that the task of assigning breed to dogs from images is considered exceptionally challenging. To see why, consider that even a human would have great difficulty in distinguishing between a Brittany and a Welsh Springer Spaniel.

Brittany Welsh Springer Spaniel

It is not difficult to find other dog breed pairs with minimal inter-class variation (for instance, Curly-Coated Retrievers and American Water Spaniels).

Curly-Coated Retriever American Water Spaniel

Likewise, recall that labradors come in yellow, chocolate, and black. Your vision-based algorithm will have to conquer this high intra-class variation to determine how to classify all of these different shades as the same breed.

Yellow Labrador Chocolate Labrador Black Labrador

We also mention that random chance presents an exceptionally low bar: setting aside the fact that the classes are slightly imabalanced, a random guess will provide a correct answer roughly 1 in 133 times, which corresponds to an accuracy of less than 1%.

Remember that the practice is far ahead of the theory in deep learning. Experiment with many different architectures, and trust your intuition. And, of course, have fun!

Pre-process the Data

We rescale the images by dividing every pixel in every image by 255.

In [29]:
from PIL import ImageFile                            
ImageFile.LOAD_TRUNCATED_IMAGES = True                 

# pre-process the data for Keras
train_tensors = paths_to_tensor(train_files).astype('float32')/255
valid_tensors = paths_to_tensor(valid_files).astype('float32')/255
test_tensors = paths_to_tensor(test_files).astype('float32')/255
100%|██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 6680/6680 [02:56<00:00, 37.88it/s]
100%|████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 835/835 [01:54<00:00,  7.31it/s]
100%|████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 836/836 [00:43<00:00, 19.19it/s]

(IMPLEMENTATION) Model Architecture

Create a CNN to classify dog breed. At the end of your code cell block, summarize the layers of your model by executing the line:

    model.summary()

We have imported some Python modules to get you started, but feel free to import as many modules as you need. If you end up getting stuck, here's a hint that specifies a model that trains relatively fast on CPU and attains >1% test accuracy in 5 epochs:

Sample CNN

Question 4: Outline the steps you took to get to your final CNN architecture and your reasoning at each step. If you chose to use the hinted architecture above, describe why you think that CNN architecture should work well for the image classification task.

Answer:

I have worked on various examples to train a deep learning model, and study a few architectures. Also I was aided by the image about the CNN architecture in the previous post and I was inspired by the youtube video from udacity about CNN source. In most of the cases I found that the idea is to get a good accuracy while keeping a simple architecture.

  1. I found that the kernel_size is an important feature that we could start with a bigger window size and then gradually decreasing the size to capture the minute details.

  2. Another observation is to use a MaxPool layer after the convolution layer, to reduce the number of features to train and finally a global_average_pooling layer is prefered over flattern layer before passing the features into a Dense layer.

  3. The final activation function is preferd to be 'softmax' in cases we want multi class/label as output, and relu could be used at other layers.

  4. A dropout layer after every alternate convolution layer of atleast before feeding to Dense layer is useful (as it reduces chances of overfitting)

However, the accuracy with this architecture is not much as it is losing most of the information and couldn't converge completely. The last Softmax layer is used to predict required 133 classes.

Based on these points in mind, I have designed the following model.

In [37]:
from keras.layers import Conv2D, MaxPooling2D, GlobalAveragePooling2D
from keras.layers import Dropout, Flatten, Dense, Activation, BatchNormalization
from keras.models import Sequential

model = Sequential()
model.add(Conv2D(filters=16, kernel_size=(4,4), padding="same", strides=1, input_shape=(224,224,3)))
model.add(Activation('relu'))
model.add(BatchNormalization()) # Normalize the activations of the previous layer at each batch, i.e. applies a transformation that maintains the mean activation close to 0 and the activation standard deviation close to 1.
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2)) # Max pooling operation  for spatial data.
model.add(Dropout(.2))

model.add(Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=(3,3), padding="same", strides=1))
model.add(Activation('relu'))
model.add(BatchNormalization()) # Normalize the activations of the previous layer at each batch, i.e. applies a transformation that maintains the mean activation close to 0 and the activation standard deviation close to 1.
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2)) # Max pooling operation for spatial data.
model.add(Dropout(.2))

model.add(Conv2D(filters=64, kernel_size=(2,2), padding="same", strides=1))
model.add(Activation('relu'))
model.add(BatchNormalization()) # Normalize the activations of the previous layer at each batch, i.e. applies a transformation that maintains the mean activation close to 0 and the activation standard deviation close to 1.
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2)) # Max pooling operation for decreasing the spatial data.
model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D())
model.add(Dropout(.2))

model.add(Dense(133))
model.add(Activation('softmax'))

### TODO: Define your architecture.

model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
conv2d_16 (Conv2D)           (None, 224, 224, 16)      784       
_________________________________________________________________
activation_18 (Activation)   (None, 224, 224, 16)      0         
_________________________________________________________________
batch_normalization_7 (Batch (None, 224, 224, 16)      64        
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_16 (MaxPooling (None, 112, 112, 16)      0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_10 (Dropout)         (None, 112, 112, 16)      0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_17 (Conv2D)           (None, 112, 112, 32)      4640      
_________________________________________________________________
activation_19 (Activation)   (None, 112, 112, 32)      0         
_________________________________________________________________
batch_normalization_8 (Batch (None, 112, 112, 32)      128       
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_17 (MaxPooling (None, 56, 56, 32)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_11 (Dropout)         (None, 56, 56, 32)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_18 (Conv2D)           (None, 56, 56, 64)        8256      
_________________________________________________________________
activation_20 (Activation)   (None, 56, 56, 64)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
batch_normalization_9 (Batch (None, 56, 56, 64)        256       
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_18 (MaxPooling (None, 28, 28, 64)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
global_average_pooling2d_6 ( (None, 64)                0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_12 (Dropout)         (None, 64)                0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_9 (Dense)              (None, 133)               8645      
_________________________________________________________________
activation_21 (Activation)   (None, 133)               0         
=================================================================
Total params: 22,773
Trainable params: 22,549
Non-trainable params: 224
_________________________________________________________________

Compile the Model

In [38]:
model.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])

(IMPLEMENTATION) Train the Model

Train your model in the code cell below. Use model checkpointing to save the model that attains the best validation loss.

You are welcome to augment the training data, but this is not a requirement.

In [39]:
from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint  

### TODO: specify the number of epochs that you would like to use to train the model.

epochs = 10

### Do NOT modify the code below this line.

checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)

model.fit(train_tensors, train_targets, 
          validation_data=(valid_tensors, valid_targets),
          epochs=epochs, batch_size=32, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=1)
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 471s 71ms/step - loss: 4.8992 - acc: 0.0166 - val_loss: 4.8960 - val_acc: 0.0192

Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from inf to 4.89596, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
Epoch 2/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 172s 26ms/step - loss: 4.7557 - acc: 0.0249 - val_loss: 4.7512 - val_acc: 0.0204

Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 4.89596 to 4.75115, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
Epoch 3/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 166s 25ms/step - loss: 4.6673 - acc: 0.0322 - val_loss: 4.7320 - val_acc: 0.0263

Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 4.75115 to 4.73197, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
Epoch 4/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 167s 25ms/step - loss: 4.6030 - acc: 0.0350 - val_loss: 4.6988 - val_acc: 0.0251

Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 4.73197 to 4.69880, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
Epoch 5/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 167s 25ms/step - loss: 4.5450 - acc: 0.0433 - val_loss: 4.6163 - val_acc: 0.0395

Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 4.69880 to 4.61630, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
Epoch 6/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 166s 25ms/step - loss: 4.4969 - acc: 0.0491 - val_loss: 4.5886 - val_acc: 0.0395

Epoch 00006: val_loss improved from 4.61630 to 4.58859, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
Epoch 7/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 166s 25ms/step - loss: 4.4557 - acc: 0.0533 - val_loss: 4.5415 - val_acc: 0.0383

Epoch 00007: val_loss improved from 4.58859 to 4.54154, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
Epoch 8/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 166s 25ms/step - loss: 4.4098 - acc: 0.0567 - val_loss: 4.5354 - val_acc: 0.0395

Epoch 00008: val_loss improved from 4.54154 to 4.53541, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
Epoch 9/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 166s 25ms/step - loss: 4.3680 - acc: 0.0593 - val_loss: 4.5730 - val_acc: 0.0383

Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve from 4.53541
Epoch 10/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 166s 25ms/step - loss: 4.3339 - acc: 0.0650 - val_loss: 4.6358 - val_acc: 0.0431

Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve from 4.53541
Out[39]:
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x253881927f0>

Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [40]:
model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5')

Test the Model

Try out your model on the test dataset of dog images. Ensure that your test accuracy is greater than 1%.

In [42]:
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
dog_breed_predictions = [np.argmax(model.predict(np.expand_dims(tensor, axis=0))) for tensor in test_tensors]

# report test accuracy
test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(dog_breed_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(dog_breed_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 4.0670%

Step 4: Use a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds

To reduce training time without sacrificing accuracy, we show you how to train a CNN using transfer learning. In the following step, you will get a chance to use transfer learning to train your own CNN.

Obtain Bottleneck Features

In [24]:
bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/DogVGG16Data.npz')
train_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['test']

Model Architecture

The model uses the the pre-trained VGG-16 model as a fixed feature extractor, where the last convolutional output of VGG-16 is fed as input to our model. We only add a global average pooling layer and a fully connected layer, where the latter contains one node for each dog category and is equipped with a softmax.

In [25]:
VGG16_model = Sequential()
VGG16_model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D(input_shape=train_VGG16.shape[1:]))
VGG16_model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))

VGG16_model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
global_average_pooling2d_3 ( (None, 512)               0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_4 (Dense)              (None, 133)               68229     
=================================================================
Total params: 68,229
Trainable params: 68,229
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

Compile the Model

In [26]:
VGG16_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='rmsprop', metrics=['accuracy'])

Train the Model

In [27]:
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)

VGG16_model.fit(train_VGG16, train_targets, 
          validation_data=(valid_VGG16, valid_targets),
          epochs=20, batch_size=32, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=1)
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 64s 10ms/step - loss: 12.2502 - acc: 0.1133 - val_loss: 10.4952 - val_acc: 0.1952

Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from inf to 10.49519, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 2/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 603us/step - loss: 9.2672 - acc: 0.2973 - val_loss: 9.0251 - val_acc: 0.3102

Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 10.49519 to 9.02510, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 3/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 573us/step - loss: 8.3389 - acc: 0.3925 - val_loss: 8.4419 - val_acc: 0.3665

Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 9.02510 to 8.44192, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 4/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 593us/step - loss: 7.9066 - acc: 0.4445 - val_loss: 8.2999 - val_acc: 0.3737

Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 8.44192 to 8.29987, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 5/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 574us/step - loss: 7.6096 - acc: 0.4741 - val_loss: 8.0123 - val_acc: 0.3928

Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 8.29987 to 8.01234, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 6/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 584us/step - loss: 7.3097 - acc: 0.5019 - val_loss: 7.7561 - val_acc: 0.4144

Epoch 00006: val_loss improved from 8.01234 to 7.75613, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 7/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 536us/step - loss: 7.0264 - acc: 0.5246 - val_loss: 7.5097 - val_acc: 0.4299

Epoch 00007: val_loss improved from 7.75613 to 7.50967, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 8/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 528us/step - loss: 6.6987 - acc: 0.5439 - val_loss: 7.2542 - val_acc: 0.4251

Epoch 00008: val_loss improved from 7.50967 to 7.25418, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 9/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 534us/step - loss: 6.3896 - acc: 0.5696 - val_loss: 7.0221 - val_acc: 0.4515

Epoch 00009: val_loss improved from 7.25418 to 7.02206, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 10/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 534us/step - loss: 6.2918 - acc: 0.5879 - val_loss: 6.9994 - val_acc: 0.4695

Epoch 00010: val_loss improved from 7.02206 to 6.99938, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 11/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 546us/step - loss: 6.2573 - acc: 0.5948 - val_loss: 6.9834 - val_acc: 0.4707

Epoch 00011: val_loss improved from 6.99938 to 6.98341, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 12/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 566us/step - loss: 6.1483 - acc: 0.6004 - val_loss: 6.8250 - val_acc: 0.4778

Epoch 00012: val_loss improved from 6.98341 to 6.82499, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 13/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 565us/step - loss: 6.0145 - acc: 0.6129 - val_loss: 6.7715 - val_acc: 0.4719

Epoch 00013: val_loss improved from 6.82499 to 6.77145, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 14/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 571us/step - loss: 5.8948 - acc: 0.6138 - val_loss: 6.6078 - val_acc: 0.4874

Epoch 00014: val_loss improved from 6.77145 to 6.60785, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 15/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 573us/step - loss: 5.7095 - acc: 0.6289 - val_loss: 6.4978 - val_acc: 0.4862

Epoch 00015: val_loss improved from 6.60785 to 6.49784, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 16/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 583us/step - loss: 5.4846 - acc: 0.6455 - val_loss: 6.3538 - val_acc: 0.4970

Epoch 00016: val_loss improved from 6.49784 to 6.35382, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 17/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 571us/step - loss: 5.4428 - acc: 0.6531 - val_loss: 6.2853 - val_acc: 0.5126

Epoch 00017: val_loss improved from 6.35382 to 6.28525, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 18/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 563us/step - loss: 5.4180 - acc: 0.6554 - val_loss: 6.2552 - val_acc: 0.5114

Epoch 00018: val_loss improved from 6.28525 to 6.25524, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 19/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 572us/step - loss: 5.3003 - acc: 0.6561 - val_loss: 6.1135 - val_acc: 0.5186

Epoch 00019: val_loss improved from 6.25524 to 6.11347, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Epoch 20/20
6680/6680 [==============================] - 4s 565us/step - loss: 5.1405 - acc: 0.6678 - val_loss: 6.0972 - val_acc: 0.5138

Epoch 00020: val_loss improved from 6.11347 to 6.09723, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
Out[27]:
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x1b97e531390>

Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [28]:
VGG16_model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5')

Test the Model

Now, we can use the CNN to test how well it identifies breed within our test dataset of dog images. We print the test accuracy below.

In [29]:
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
VGG16_predictions = [np.argmax(VGG16_model.predict(np.expand_dims(feature, axis=0))) for feature in test_VGG16]

# report test accuracy
test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(VGG16_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(VGG16_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 52.6316%

Predict Dog Breed with the Model

In [12]:
from extract_bottleneck_features import *

def VGG16_predict_breed(img_path):
    # extract bottleneck features
    bottleneck_feature = extract_VGG16(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    # obtain predicted vector
    predicted_vector = VGG16_model.predict(bottleneck_feature)
    # return dog breed that is predicted by the model
    return dog_names[np.argmax(predicted_vector)]

Step 5: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)

You will now use transfer learning to create a CNN that can identify dog breed from images. Your CNN must attain at least 60% accuracy on the test set.

In Step 4, we used transfer learning to create a CNN using VGG-16 bottleneck features. In this section, you must use the bottleneck features from a different pre-trained model. To make things easier for you, we have pre-computed the features for all of the networks that are currently available in Keras:

The files are encoded as such:

Dog{network}Data.npz

where {network}, in the above filename, can be one of VGG19, Resnet50, InceptionV3, or Xception. Pick one of the above architectures, download the corresponding bottleneck features, and store the downloaded file in the bottleneck_features/ folder in the repository.

(IMPLEMENTATION) Obtain Bottleneck Features

In the code block below, extract the bottleneck features corresponding to the train, test, and validation sets by running the following:

bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/Dog{network}Data.npz')
train_{network} = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_{network} = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_{network} = bottleneck_features['test']
In [14]:
### TODO: Obtain bottleneck features from another pre-trained CNN.
bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/DogResnet50Data.npz')
train_resnet50 = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_resnet50 = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_resnet50 = bottleneck_features['test']

(IMPLEMENTATION) Model Architecture

Create a CNN to classify dog breed. At the end of your code cell block, summarize the layers of your model by executing the line:

    <your model's name>.summary()

Question 5: Outline the steps you took to get to your final CNN architecture and your reasoning at each step. Describe why you think the architecture is suitable for the current problem.

Answer:

The idea that I followed is the following: model takes the features extracted from the Resnet50 model and feeds thems into a new model which has a Dense layer with 133 breeds to classify into and a softmax activation function. The Global Average Pooling layer is useful to reduce the number of number of features to compute and is an alternative and a better choice over Flattern layer.

In contrast with a typical CNN (like the one that I built before), which does not offer good kind of results that will satisfy our problem, The results from a model with Transfer Learning are much more promisising. The implementation uses Resnet50 to transfer the learning to our model, instead of us starting from scratch.

The initial Resnet50 model, will provide a good starting point, with features, weights etc already tuned with features of objects similiar to one we wish to identify for example human/dog and its breed.

In [17]:
### TODO: Define your architecture.
model_resnet50 =  Sequential()
model_resnet50.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D(input_shape= train_resnet50.shape[1:] ))
model_resnet50.add(Dense(133))
model_resnet50.add(Activation('softmax'))

model_resnet50.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
global_average_pooling2d_2 ( (None, 2048)              0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_3 (Dense)              (None, 133)               272517    
_________________________________________________________________
activation_53 (Activation)   (None, 133)               0         
=================================================================
Total params: 272,517
Trainable params: 272,517
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

(IMPLEMENTATION) Compile the Model

In [18]:
### TODO: Compile the model.
model_resnet50.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'], optimizer='rmsprop')

(IMPLEMENTATION) Train the Model

Train your model in the code cell below. Use model checkpointing to save the model that attains the best validation loss.

You are welcome to augment the training data, but this is not a requirement.

In [19]:
### TODO: Train the model.
from keras.preprocessing.image import ImageDataGenerator


checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint('saved_models/weights.best.ressnet.hdf5', save_best_only=True, verbose=1)

epochs = 10
batch_size = 32
model_resnet50.fit(train_resnet50, train_targets ,batch_size=batch_size ,
                             validation_data=(valid_resnet50,valid_targets),
                             epochs=epochs, verbose=1, callbacks=[checkpointer])
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 6s 925us/step - loss: 1.7550 - acc: 0.5731 - val_loss: 0.8596 - val_acc: 0.7437

Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from inf to 0.85959, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.ressnet.hdf5
Epoch 2/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s 390us/step - loss: 0.4568 - acc: 0.8675 - val_loss: 0.6998 - val_acc: 0.7880

Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 0.85959 to 0.69984, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.ressnet.hdf5
Epoch 3/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s 391us/step - loss: 0.2583 - acc: 0.9207 - val_loss: 0.6583 - val_acc: 0.8012

Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 0.69984 to 0.65829, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.ressnet.hdf5
Epoch 4/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s 384us/step - loss: 0.1624 - acc: 0.9545 - val_loss: 0.5992 - val_acc: 0.8132

Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 0.65829 to 0.59920, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.ressnet.hdf5
Epoch 5/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s 400us/step - loss: 0.1098 - acc: 0.9684 - val_loss: 0.6350 - val_acc: 0.8228

Epoch 00005: val_loss did not improve from 0.59920
Epoch 6/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s 396us/step - loss: 0.0786 - acc: 0.9786 - val_loss: 0.6553 - val_acc: 0.8228

Epoch 00006: val_loss did not improve from 0.59920
Epoch 7/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s 385us/step - loss: 0.0537 - acc: 0.9852 - val_loss: 0.6118 - val_acc: 0.8263

Epoch 00007: val_loss did not improve from 0.59920
Epoch 8/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s 386us/step - loss: 0.0371 - acc: 0.9912 - val_loss: 0.6784 - val_acc: 0.8216

Epoch 00008: val_loss did not improve from 0.59920
Epoch 9/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s 400us/step - loss: 0.0271 - acc: 0.9945 - val_loss: 0.6930 - val_acc: 0.8216

Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve from 0.59920
Epoch 10/10
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s 388us/step - loss: 0.0202 - acc: 0.9964 - val_loss: 0.6725 - val_acc: 0.8311

Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve from 0.59920
Out[19]:
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x1c7ce3c8358>

(IMPLEMENTATION) Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [20]:
### TODO: Load the model weights with the best validation loss.
model_resnet50.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.ressnet.hdf5')

(IMPLEMENTATION) Test the Model

Try out your model on the test dataset of dog images. Ensure that your test accuracy is greater than 60%.

In [21]:
### TODO: Calculate classification accuracy on the test dataset.
model_resnet50_prediction =[np.argmax(model_resnet50.predict(np.expand_dims(feature,axis=0))) for feature in test_resnet50]

test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(model_resnet50_prediction)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(model_resnet50_prediction)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 79.4258%

(IMPLEMENTATION) Predict Dog Breed with the Model

Write a function that takes an image path as input and returns the dog breed (Affenpinscher, Afghan_hound, etc) that is predicted by your model.

Similar to the analogous function in Step 5, your function should have three steps:

  1. Extract the bottleneck features corresponding to the chosen CNN model.
  2. Supply the bottleneck features as input to the model to return the predicted vector. Note that the argmax of this prediction vector gives the index of the predicted dog breed.
  3. Use the dog_names array defined in Step 0 of this notebook to return the corresponding breed.

The functions to extract the bottleneck features can be found in extract_bottleneck_features.py, and they have been imported in an earlier code cell. To obtain the bottleneck features corresponding to your chosen CNN architecture, you need to use the function

extract_{network}

where {network}, in the above filename, should be one of VGG19, Resnet50, InceptionV3, or Xception.

In [38]:
### TODO: Write a function that takes a path to an image as input
### and returns the dog breed that is predicted by the model.

from extract_bottleneck_features import *

def resnet50_predict_breed(path) :
    bottleneck_feature = extract_Resnet50(path_to_tensor(path))
    predicted_vector = model_resnet50.predict(bottleneck_feature)
    return dog_names[np.argmax(predicted_vector)]
In [45]:
img_path = 'dogImages/test/004.Akita/Akita_00263.jpg'
breed = resnet50_predict_breed(img_path)
print("The breed is {}".format(breed))
img = cv2.imread(img_path)
cv_rgb = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
imgplot = plt.imshow(cv_rgb)
The breed is Akita

Step 6: Write your Algorithm

Write an algorithm that accepts a file path to an image and first determines whether the image contains a human, dog, or neither. Then,

  • if a dog is detected in the image, return the predicted breed.
  • if a human is detected in the image, return the resembling dog breed.
  • if neither is detected in the image, provide output that indicates an error.

You are welcome to write your own functions for detecting humans and dogs in images, but feel free to use the face_detector and dog_detector functions developed above. You are required to use your CNN from Step 5 to predict dog breed.

Some sample output for our algorithm is provided below, but feel free to design your own user experience!

Sample Human Output

(IMPLEMENTATION) Write your Algorithm

In [31]:
### TODO: Write your algorithm.
### Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.

def is_dog(img_path):
    prediction = ResNet50_predict_labels(img_path)
    return ((prediction <= 268) & (prediction >= 151))


def is_human(img_path):
    face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('haarcascades/haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml')
    img = cv2.imread(img_path)
    gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
    faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)
    return len(faces) > 0 


def detect_breed(path):
    bottleneck_feature = extract_Resnet50(path_to_tensor(path))
    predicted_vector = model_resnet50.predict(bottleneck_feature)
    return dog_names[np.argmax(predicted_vector)]


def predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed(img_path):
    img = cv2.imread(img_path)
    rgb_img = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
    _ = plt.imshow(rgb_img)
    breed = detect_breed(img_path)
    if is_dog(img_path): 
        print('Hello Dog! Seems like a beautiful {} good dog!'.format(breed))
    elif is_human(img_path):
        print('This is human that resembles a {} dog'.format(breed))
    else: 
        print("I do not know whether you are a human or a dog ?")
In [32]:
predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed('images/Brittany_02625.jpg')
Hello Dog! Seems like a beautiful Brittany good dog!
In [33]:
predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed('images/Curly-coated_retriever_03896.jpg')
Hello Dog! Seems like a beautiful Curly-coated_retriever good dog!
In [34]:
predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed('images/sample_cnn.png')
I do not know whether you are a human or a dog ?

Step 7: Test Your Algorithm

In this section, you will take your new algorithm for a spin! What kind of dog does the algorithm think that you look like? If you have a dog, does it predict your dog's breed accurately? If you have a cat, does it mistakenly think that your cat is a dog?

(IMPLEMENTATION) Test Your Algorithm on Sample Images!

Test your algorithm at least six images on your computer. Feel free to use any images you like. Use at least two human and two dog images.

Question 6: Is the output better than you expected :) ? Or worse :( ? Provide at least three possible points of improvement for your algorithm.

Answer:

In [35]:
## TODO: Execute your algorithm from Step 6 on
## at least 6 images on your computer.
## Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.

predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed('images/siraj.jpg')
This is human that resembles a Maltese dog
In [36]:
predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed('images/andrew_ng.jpg')
This is human that resembles a Black_russian_terrier dog
In [37]:
predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed('images/mac.jpg')
I do not know whether you are a human or a dog ?
In [38]:
predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed('images/retriever.jpg')
Hello Dog! Seems like a beautiful Kuvasz good dog!
In [39]:
predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed('images/spaniel.jpg')
Hello Dog! Seems like a beautiful English_cocker_spaniel good dog!
In [40]:
predict_resembling_human_or_dog_breed('images/nvidia.jpg')
I do not know whether you are a human or a dog ?

The results are better than what I expected because the images I tested were quite accurately identified as humans οr dogs or other objects.

I think we could optimize the algorithms as:

  • We can set minimum thresholds as cut-offs below which we will not consider dog/face identified by algorithim. for example, if threshold is set at 80%, any face/dog identified with much less certainity will be not considered. Moreover, we can take the probabilities of both image being dog or human and then decide if its dog or human rather than using if/else condition. For instance, an image gets identified as dog with 60% probability, and face as 80% probability, since we are using an if/else block it will be identified as dog(in our case). Finally we can build an essemble model by combining several trained models.